Is AG1 worth $79 per month?

AG1 can be worth it if you have an inconsistent diet and want a single-scoop nutritional safety net. However, if you already eat well and track biomarkers, targeted supplements at clinical doses (like Blueprint Longevity Mix at $49/month) may deliver better value per dollar with full dosing transparency.

What is the difference between AG1 and Blueprint Longevity Mix?

AG1 contains 75 ingredients in a 12g scoop with proprietary blends (exact doses not disclosed). Blueprint Longevity Mix contains 13 ingredients in a 14.8g scoop with all doses published and aligned with clinical research. AG1 costs $79/month; Blueprint costs $49/month. The key philosophical difference is ingredient count vs. ingredient dosing.

Does AG1 have enough creatine for longevity benefits?

AG1 does not contain creatine. Clinical research supports 3-5g of creatine monohydrate daily for cognitive and physical benefits. Blueprint Longevity Mix includes 2,500mg, and supplementing an additional 2,500mg separately brings you to the full 5g clinical dose.

Can AG1 replace a multivitamin?

AG1 provides broad micronutrient coverage and may replace a basic multivitamin for some people. However, certain vitamins like D3 are included at maintenance doses (1,000 IU) rather than therapeutic doses. Most longevity-focused protocols recommend 5,000 IU of D3, meaning you may still need separate supplementation.

What does pixie dusting mean in supplements?

Pixie dusting is when a supplement includes an ingredient on its label at a dose too small to produce the benefits shown in clinical research. For example, if studies show ashwagandha works at 300-600mg but a product includes only 50mg, it is technically present but unlikely to be effective. Proprietary blends make this hard to verify.

What supplements should I take for longevity on a budget?

A cost-effective longevity foundation includes: creatine monohydrate (5g/day, ~$15/month), a quality greens/micronutrient mix like Blueprint Longevity Mix ($49/month), omega-3 from algae oil ($39/month), extra virgin olive oil with meals, and a basic multivitamin. Get baseline bloodwork first to know your actual deficiencies before buying anything.

AG1 vs Blueprint Longevity Mix: Why I Chose Blueprint (And What My Data Shows)

Published: March 2026 · Read time: 12 minutes · Category: Supplements
Last updated: March 3, 2026

Disclosure: I have never tried AG1. This comparison is based on ingredient analysis, published clinical dosing research, and my own bloodwork results from using Blueprint Longevity Mix as my daily foundation. Some links on this page are affiliate links. Full disclosure →

The Bottom Line

AG1 is the most marketed supplement on the internet. Every podcast has the ad read. Every influencer has the discount code. When I was building my longevity protocol, AG1 was the obvious first choice — $79/month, "75 ingredients," one scoop, done.

I didn't buy it. Here's why.

After researching ingredient dosing, clinical evidence, and cost-per-effective-dose, I went with Blueprint Longevity Mix instead. Six months later, I'm tracking 41 biomarkers with zero out of range, a functional age of 23.5 (chronological: 33), and a Don't Die global ranking of #97.

I'm not saying AG1 is bad. I'm saying I found something that made more sense for how I approach health — and I have the data to explain why.

Why I Didn't Choose AG1

My decision came down to three factors: dosing transparency, ingredient count vs. ingredient efficacy, and cost per effective dose.

The Dosing Problem

AG1 contains 75 ingredients in a 12-gram scoop. That math should give you pause.

Divide 12 grams across 75 ingredients and many are present at sub-therapeutic doses — what the supplement industry calls "pixie dusting." The ingredient is on the label, but not at a dose that research supports.

AG1 lists ashwagandha. Most clinical studies use 300–600mg of a standardized extract like KSM-66. AG1 uses a proprietary blend, so the exact dose isn't disclosed. Given the total formula weight, it's almost certainly below the clinically studied dose. Same concern with Rhodiola, CoQ10, and several other listed ingredients.

Present on the label? Yes. At effective doses? That's the question I couldn't answer — and that's why I moved on.

Blueprint's Approach

Blueprint Longevity Mix takes a different philosophy: fewer ingredients, clinical-trial-level doses, full transparency. The formula includes CaAKG, creatine monohydrate, ashwagandha KSM-66, glycine, L-theanine, glutathione, taurine, magnesium, and vitamin C — all at doses published on the label and aligned with the research I could verify.

Bryan Johnson built this based on what he actually takes and measures. Whether you agree with his broader protocol or not, the dosing rigor is real.

The Ingredient Comparison

Factor	AG1 ($79/mo)	Blueprint Longevity Mix ($49/mo)
Total ingredients	75	13
Scoop size	12g	14.8g
Creatine	Not included	2,500mg (I add 2,500mg more separately)
Ashwagandha (KSM-66)	Included (dose undisclosed)	600mg (clinical dose)
Magnesium	Magnesium citrate (dose unclear)	Magnesium citrate (dose published)
L-Theanine	Listed in blend	200mg (clinical dose)
Glutathione	Not included	250mg reduced form
CaAKG	Not included	1,000mg
Probiotics	Included	Not included
Proprietary blends	Yes — exact doses hidden	No — all doses published
Third-party tested	Yes	Yes (COAs published)

The key difference: AG1 optimizes for ingredient count. Blueprint optimizes for ingredient dosing. These are fundamentally different philosophies, and which one matters to you depends on how you approach supplementation.

What My Data Shows on Blueprint

I've been taking Blueprint Longevity Mix as my daily foundation for six months. Here's what my tracking shows:

Bloodwork (quarterly panels, 41 biomarkers):

Zero biomarkers out of range
Vitamin D, B12, folate all at optimal levels (supplemented separately where needed)
hs-CRP (inflammation) consistently low
Full lipid panel in healthy ranges

Wearable data (WHOOP + Oura, worn 24/7):

Functional age: 23.5 (chronological: 33)
Cardiovascular age via Oura: 25
VO2 Max: 46 (+31% improvement in 14 months)
HRV trending up over 6-month window

Don't Die app:

Global rank: #97
All metrics aggregated from WHOOP, Oura, and manual inputs

Am I attributing all of this to Blueprint Longevity Mix? No. That would be dishonest. My results come from the full protocol — training (PPL 3–4x/week), nutrition (Mediterranean diet, ~180g protein/day), sleep optimization (screens off 1–1.5hr before bed, 3.5hr no-food buffer, 70°F room), and the complete supplement stack.

But the Longevity Mix is the foundation that replaced the idea of needing a greens powder like AG1. And the data says the foundation is working.

The Cost Breakdown

Item	AG1 Route	My Actual Route
Daily greens/foundation	AG1: $79/mo	Blueprint Longevity Mix: $49/mo
Creatine (5g/day)	Not included — need separate: $15/mo	$15/mo (separate, to hit full 5g)
Omega-3	Not included — need separate: $39/mo	Blueprint Omega-3: $39/mo
Multivitamin	Possibly redundant with AG1	Men's One A Day: $12/mo
EVOO	Not included	High polyphenol EVOO: $20/mo
Pre-workout	Not included	Woke AF (gym days): $15/mo
Total foundation	$79/mo + gaps	$150/mo, no gaps

AG1 looks cheaper on the surface. But once you account for the supplements AG1 doesn't cover at therapeutic doses — creatine, omega-3, targeted vitamins — the cost difference narrows and you end up managing multiple products anyway.

My full stack runs about $336/month including protein shakes, gym membership, and wearable subscriptions. But the supplement-only portion is roughly $150/month with every ingredient at a dose I can defend.

Who AG1 Actually Makes Sense For

I want to be fair. AG1 isn't for me, but it might be right for you.

AG1 works if you:

Have an inconsistent diet and need broad nutritional insurance
Don't want to research individual supplement doses
Value the one-scoop morning ritual and hydration prompt
Are just starting your optimization journey and want a single starting point
Don't currently track biomarkers or run blood panels

AG1 doesn't work if you:

Already eat a nutrient-dense diet (Mediterranean, whole foods, etc.)
Want to know exact doses of what you're taking
Track biomarkers and optimize for specific outcomes
Are building a targeted protocol based on your own bloodwork
Want maximum value per dollar spent on supplementation

What I'd Do If I Were Starting From Zero

If I were building a longevity stack today with no existing protocol:

Get baseline bloodwork. Know your actual deficiencies before buying anything. This single step puts you ahead of 95% of people taking supplements.
Start with Blueprint Longevity Mix + 2.5g additional creatine. Clinical doses, transparent label, $49/month. This covers your foundational micronutrients, creatine, and key longevity compounds.
Add omega-3 (algae-based). 800mg EPA/DHA. Non-negotiable for inflammation and cardiovascular health.
Eat a Mediterranean diet with EVOO. This replaces the need for a dozen anti-inflammatory supplements.
Retest bloodwork in 90 days. Adjust based on data, not marketing.

That's it. Five steps, no pixie dusting, and you'll know exactly what's working because you measured before and after.

The Final Word

I respect what AG1 has built. The brand is strong, the product quality appears solid, and the convenience factor is real. If someone told me they take AG1 and nothing else, I'd say they're doing better than 90% of people.

But I'm chasing the other 10%. I want to know exactly what I'm taking, at what dose, and whether it's moving my bloodwork. Blueprint Longevity Mix gave me that transparency. My data backs the decision.

Run your own blood work. Know your deficiencies. Supplement accordingly. Build a protocol boring enough to stick with for years, not exciting enough to abandon in months.

That's the actual protocol.

See my full daily protocol: My Protocol →
See everything I use: Shop →